An area court chooses a movement to compel arbitration beneath the standard that is same

An area court chooses a movement to compel arbitration beneath the standard that is same

Jurisdiction and Standard of Review

The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). DTL met the $5 million threshold for jurisdiction beneath the Class Action Fairness Act by claiming that, under Kaneff’s concept of obligation, it had gotten $3,846,481 in interest from Pennsylvania residents on the four years before the suit, and encountered possible treble harm obligation. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

It pertains to a movement for summary judgment. Par-Knit Mills, Inc. V. Stockbridge Fabrics Co., Ltd., 636 F. 2d 51, 54 (3d Cir. 1980). The party arbitration that is opposing offered “the good thing about all reasonable doubts and inferences which will arise. ” Id. On appeal, a “question in regards to the scope and applicability of an arbitration agreement” is subject to de novo review.